Skip to main content
Fetch.ai Integration

Stigmergy vs ASI:One

Centralized LLM coordination creates bottlenecks and single points of failure. Stigmergic coordination distributes intelligence, enabling true scalability.

Interactive Comparison

Why Stigmergy Beats Centralized LLM Coordination

Watch how centralized systems bottleneck under load while stigmergic coordination scales seamlessly

Agent Count50
10200
Centralized Metrics
Latency
2.3s
Cost/Query
$0.02
Max Agents
~100
Recovery
Manual
Queue Size
0
Processed
0
Stigmergic Metrics
Latency
5ms
Cost/Query
$0.00
Max Agents
Unlimited
Recovery
Automatic
Active Tasks
0
Processed
0

Key Insight

Centralized coordination creates a single point of failure and bottleneck. Stigmergic systems distribute intelligence across all agents, enabling parallel processing, automatic recovery, and unlimited scalability.

The Technical Difference

Understanding why stigmergy outperforms centralized orchestration

X Centralized (ASI:One)
1.

Single Point of Failure

If the LLM coordinator goes down, every agent stops working.

2.

O(n) Bottleneck

All decisions route through one coordinator. Latency grows linearly with agent count.

3.

High Cost per Query

Every coordination decision requires an LLM API call (~$0.02/query).

4.

Manual Recovery

System failures require human intervention to restart and resync.

5.

Limited Scalability

Practical limit of ~100 agents before latency becomes unacceptable.

+ Stigmergic (Ants at Work)
1.

No Single Point of Failure

Intelligence distributed across all agents. Loss of any agent doesn't stop the system.

2.

O(1) Parallel Processing

Agents coordinate through environment (pheromones), not a central hub. Constant-time overhead.

3.

Near-Zero Coordination Cost

Pheromone signals are simple data writes. No expensive LLM calls for coordination.

4.

Automatic Recovery

Remaining agents route around failures automatically. Self-healing by design.

5.

Unlimited Scalability

Scales to millions of agents. More agents = more parallel processing power.

Performance Comparison

Metric ASI:One Stigmergic Improvement
Coordination Latency 2,300ms 5ms 460x faster
Cost per Query $0.02 $0.00 Infinite
Max Agents ~100 Unlimited N/A
Failure Recovery Manual Automatic Self-healing
Recovery Time 5-30 min <2 sec 150-900x faster
Coordination Complexity O(n) O(1) Linear vs Constant

How Stigmergic Coordination Works

Inspired by 140 million years of ant colony evolution

1

Agent Discovers Opportunity

An agent finds a task, resource, or important information while exploring.

+
2

Pheromone Signal Deposited

The agent leaves a "pheromone" - a signal in the shared environment (TypeDB graph) that encodes what was found and its importance.

+
3

Nearby Agents Sense Signal

Other agents naturally encounter the pheromone while exploring. No central dispatch needed - discovery is emergent.

+
4

Reinforcement Creates Highways

Successful paths get reinforced. Failed paths decay. Over time, optimal routes emerge - the colony "learns" without any agent knowing the full picture.

=
+

Emergent Collective Intelligence

The colony exhibits intelligence that no individual agent possesses. Optimal paths, adaptive responses, and coordinated behavior emerge from simple local interactions.

Ready to Build Stigmergic AI Agents?

Deploy intelligent, self-coordinating agent swarms on Fetch.ai's Agentverse using the Ants at Work framework.

The Book

Lessons from Ants at Work

© 2026 Ants at Work.

Built withfor emergent intelligence.